The Project
In order to fulfill the requirement I set for myself to learn about psychological criticism's interpretations of Shakespeare, I decided to ask an expert in the field of psychology some basic questions regarding the characters in some of Shakespeare's works. I started the conversation a few articles ago. Dr. Reynolds has yet to email me back on this latest response I gave to his email back to me.My letter to the Doctor
Dear Doctor Reynolds,
thank you for responding to my last email. Your response took some research, but I found a few valid sources after I made my initial psychoanalytic evaluation of Hamlet.
My View of Hamlet
Though there have been some performances I have heard about that portray Hamlet with the assumption that he has gone mad through the grief brought on by the loss of his father, each time I have read the play I gather that he puts on the facade of madness to cover his tracks while he haphazardly attempts to find whether or not the ghost of his father is a demonic impersonator and liar or a messenger of tragic truth. Even when he finds the truth, his tragic flaw (hesitation) robs the play of justice and replaces it with a blood bath. I think this psychological flaw of not acting out of fear or uncertainty allows for Shakespeare to send a message against those who hesitate their life away. Therefore, it is not Hamlet's madness that disturbs me, but his sanity. His id, ego, and superego are not balanced. The superego has too much of a sway in Hamlet's actions. Thus, it is clear that a conscience that is too strict is just as dangerous as a mind too focused on self gratification.